Oh, i understand now. So wasted millions for nothing.. Thats nice.
Still isnt fair. Hammerjaww adds less then malison, and he is arcane pet? What makes him now arcane? His debuff? Yes, hes an arcane fail now for all rogues.
Oh, i understand now. So wasted millions for nothing.. Thats nice.
Still isnt fair. Hammerjaww adds less then malison, and he is arcane pet? What makes him now arcane? His debuff? Yes, hes an arcane fail now for all rogues.
This!Originally Posted by Alhuntrazeck:1682983
Is our passive 5%dmg also neutralized?
Click My Signature to Check Out My YouTube Channel.
Warning: Any Beggars Will Be Put On Ignore List
So what does STS have to say about this? Basically the %DMG on pets are a lie in pvp. (For rogues)
We spend millions for a pet that gives DMG%, which is why we buy those pets, that in the end doesn't even work.
Solution: play in TDM until theres some changes
Sent from my azz
Hello developer?
I think the hj prices well go way down and glacian prices well sky rocket if they don't fix the pet bonus DMG
Sent from my XT1028 using Tapatalk
Just noticed this thread. So its not just me who is experiencing this. Please fix this. When I bought my damage buff pets, I did not expect them to be not working in pvp. My plats and gold are wasted at the moment. Just saying that something overrides something which results in us not getting the pet damage boost is not fair.
If the current system is making us not receive the pet damage boost, then it is faulty and a fix is needed. While my damage is nerfed 10% in pvp, I dont even get my pet's damage boost while other classes get it. Tanks and mages have no damage nerf and on top of that they have damage buffing pets which work for them. That makes the damage difference between the rogue class and other classes way more than intended and needed for balance in pvp. Can a dev please comment on this?
Last edited by Zynzyn; 07-06-2014 at 07:30 AM.
To be honest, I think the only dev that fully understands the damage system is null_void. I have a suspicion that the %damage stats are inaccurate.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Bookmarks