Originally Posted by
Brufuzzz
Some people are really looking at scores with 'colored glasses' on. If you mention like 3 times that you did such a great job by losing from Golden Lotus with 10-20, than something is really going wrong. Losing by 10-20 isn't good and that's why I would never say that my team did decent with a 8-20 lost. All I am saying is that the results would be a lot different if Trulle wasn't there.
Just a simple fact: You can't say that your team did better than others, when there is a 3rd party (Trulle) in the game. It changes the whole game-play and you are now more depended on the 'luck-factor'. If you want to say something like 'Not based on luck, cause both teams have their advantages and disadvantages with Trulle in the game' than I strongly disagree. Just think about the following things: We have chosen our pets & gear based on not having Trulle in the tournament. For example: Breeze is less powerful with Trulle in the game and as rogue you should always use an umbral bow with Trulle for the patch proc, cause you can barely move from Trulle's hits when you got patched. This are just small things which can influence the outcome of the match. We also had a game strategy, which couldn't be used because of Trulle.
If you disagree on these simple facts, than I am willing to demonstrate this in a 3 v 3 battle (without Trulle) to any of the signed teams of this tournament. This isn't to show-off, but to show that my statements are based on facts and not on opinions of people with colored glasses on.
Bookmarks