You were asking about the fact and example I used to describe something else not this thread title and that some thing else is explained in those posts you quoted. Those posts doesn't not explain the meaning of the title.
That's why I kept saying ur unable to understand small facts or trying to gather logic that's not there at all.If ur really confused or If you really wanna do argue logically, Start it freshly, I'll be always there to argue with u, unless you try to ignor facts from top to down again.
Last edited by Waug; 08-14-2016 at 11:08 AM.
If those posts dont have anything to do with the thread, why did you even bring it up if ur "fact" or example has nothing to do with your thread
Let me just bring a bunch of more poorly worded nonsense into this
If you don't want to explain, let me give example when kites fly then lightning and when we found out this theory.
Hope that clears things up
Glad I got op to read some physics.
What you quoted mentions one failure of Newtonian physics that the standard model we now use does not fail to explain.
But then again this whole arguement is confounded by your engrish & made humerous by your calling people's education in question at the same time.
And Magicsword is correct that this attempted example was irrelevant to this troll thread.
Cheers
The fact is - my words ain't proof neither yours, I need to show proof because I can, because whatever I stated is correct. Same if you need to prove your point, you've to show proof but you can't because you were wrong in those cases. As said My words is not proof that's the reson and needed to post a source, that's does not mean I didn't know rather I explained from begining.
Explained and proved everything, go back and read please,What you quoted mentions one failure of Newtonian physics that the standard model we now use does not fail to explain.
This is what happens when you try to show someone wrong forcefully, . you wanna support magic sword keep doing, I don't have problem. Because among PL community hyprocrisy and irony is so common, you ain't any exception.But then again this whole arguement is confounded by your engrish & made humerous by your calling people's education in question at the same time.
And Magicsword is correct that this attempted example was irrelevant to this troll thread.
Cheers
As explained several times that why I called him uneducated, just like anything else (logical) you ignored it. it's fine but defenately in my perspective he talked like uneducated in this whole thread, he's lacking common logic sense and what he says is farm away from actual point, even after giving several chances, he kept doing it, now deserve my ignorance as I'd to one child's post.
Last edited by Waug; 08-14-2016 at 08:36 PM.
Hmm.. Still a twink, but I guess I will try to understand this thread?
The Int is an Ant,
the tipe which falls into aur pants,
we crowall on the grund dgust tu act owwwwwellllltt.. Lyk.. Ahhhhh..
*crickets crickets*
Your dance!
We sing all the taem,
We swing wen we can,
We cry laff ut lowd,
And whenever we say it is not ur but is of the because its just the becumming of the prokacess inside of mah man!
Well, at least I'm happy to see that there is a because of the it is to just becumeriiiyolderering - ahem
To see that that is a thread of PL still..
HAH! Thats was gud.. That was gud. A thread... Of PL? Get it? HAH GAATEEEMM! HAH! Cuz PL is dying out 3:
No you can't. OPEN CHALLENGE prove this statement wrong -
What you said Q & A is from educational website, hopefully you have idea what .edu site is but that's not problem find your link from any reliable source and prove it here, as said, if you can't, please don't carry forward the topic with absurd logics.
Last edited by Waug; 08-15-2016 at 01:08 AM.
This is why I stopped popping in to check on PL
hi,
PL is fun I use a shiny axe for my bird hit me up if u want to hang out with me in game
Opest just stop pls ok thx 2 much broken english in one thread
Last edited by Waug; 08-16-2016 at 08:47 PM.
Bookmarks