What is fair to you? People spend 1m and people who spend 1b get the same result? This is fair you Talkin bout?
Sent from my Infinix X695C using Tapatalk
What is fair to you? People spend 1m and people who spend 1b get the same result? This is fair you Talkin bout?
Sent from my Infinix X695C using Tapatalk
Do you think STS cares that only 15 players have all the flags? no, that does not cause a stir both for the newbies in this type of event and for those who try it for the second time and see the multi-accounts take advantage of this, instead of fighting for equity they fight for greed wanting it all, I don't know try because they do this, THAT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED at this rate the game will die more, if they are not controlled, we will only see the same 20 players at the top and there will be no more competition because ah yes, guess, it is very discouraging that these with a team of 3 billion have 7 extra accounts to go on and on and then they say "You think this is not fair, the one who spends the most deserves the top" yes... he deserves 1 flag not 30 flags
The methods are fair. They are also very well known and contribute to the structure of AL’s overall LB meta. I understand that you dislike this well-established meta but I don’t see any compelling reason to change it.
It’s disappointing that this thread has brought out unrelated (personal issues of) rivalry and economic embarrassment - so I’m closing it.
Best wishes and good luck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks