But it makes for great debate.Originally Posted by Banned
But it makes for great debate.
The thrill of knowing that your items are at risk adds so much more to the battle, i guess you just cant understand that. which is a better and more exciting story?
Man I had this awesome battle, went 1 v 2 and looted some sweet stuff
OR
Man i had this awesome battle and i got 2 points
sure you enter with no items, but during the battle by dropping fools you earn some by RNG at which point they are lootable. If we do this silly point system then everyone will use the same items because they can pick and choose the best items, and it will be exactly like WoW where templates for pvp characters are largely the same with same skills and same items. With random loot you are looking at alot more unique possibilities.
I don't play for excitement, I play for competition, I want to prove I'm the best out there.
And when I face more skilled players and I beat them or work on beating them that's where I get my pleasure.
And yes, I do see your point Demarrer.
Although if you make the loser team to gain some points too, or make losing a game lose some amount of points, that would also make it not worth the while.
Ofcourse I want the best items, and eventually it's up to skill.
Dont you get it, RNG is bad, ultimately I'm losing to noobs who cant play just because they had luck on looting some damn corpses.
QFT, more customizability with looting for this reason.
the guy that complains looting wont work because this is a casual game, now says he only plays for competition not for excitement, whose being paradoxical now?
Team A kills team B until Team A gets the best stuff. Then they flip roles. Trust me, people will do it.
So you don't play for excitement, then why play at all. I thought video games were for fun and exciting?
something tells me shebee is team jacob
ddarko18, this is like the 2nd time you make things up.
I never said that something wouldn't work because this is a casual game.
Also, why would someone queue for a battle like 10-20 times and leave the arena until they face the other team, instead of facing random teams and even if losing all the battles, gaining by far more points.
I don't really see the flaw here.
And as said, I play for competition, excitement comes along, it's like in any competition, you play or compete to be the best, and it is exciting to compete.
If I want excitement I go doing stuff like jump of cliffs or something.
Point proven. Screw the rewards. Case closed, you can all get the hell outta mah house.
Point proven AGAIN. Screw the rewards and continue your walk outta mah god dang house.
My point is, I don't want to get defeated by players that I outplay, just because they have better loot they don't deserve.
As the original post says, you join as a party and it keeps you together unless you need to be broken up. So why couldn't all ten of us join a game, then it just splits us up. Boom the end, let the breaking of the point system begin.
if you want to do something competitive play basketball or something, jump off a cliff????wtf
But you are willing to defeat players by buying better items than them because you play more?
Check and mate
Haha, that has me in tears right now.
Yes, but getting the best rewards doesn't have to be hard, being a casual game and all.
That's when it comes down to skill eventually.
With the loot system though I can lag and not get my best items no matter how long I play or how skilled I am....
Woot im a member now! wheres my prize?
If you lag in PvP your screwed anyways, regardless of the system. That is the case in any game, casual or not.
With the loot system everyone can be different, it is more CUSTOMIZABLE. With the point system, at some point each match will have everyone wearing the same stuff because it is the best. Where is the customizability in that?
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks