Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: My quick balance opinions

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Zapoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    :o
    Posts
    1,545
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    59
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    195
    Thanked in
    128 Posts

    Default

    My experience is mostly from 35, 50 and 56.

    Foxes and birds dying in two hits to a class thats focus is burst damage is not strange at all. Those two are both suppose to be that way: high damage, low defense. At any rate, the mage buff is somewhat in line with the buff that's most similar to it - bear's rage. In fact, it's now much weaker than rage. Don't personally think mages need to be tuned much. The other classes are what need to be worked on more.

    However, there does seem to be something fundamentally wrong with how bear's sturdiness (or lack there of, really) is working right now. Evade feels useless, iron blood by itself isn't good enough to make them tanky, and thus the tank class for PL has been reduced to a 1 shot or be 1 shot class, which just.. seems wrong to me, personally. I think what they need is to have their strengths changed from focusing on their rage-beckon-stomp, to keeping people locked in place and debuffed. Their evade should probably be changed completely into something else. Maybe change it to add hit and armor or something (could make pure strength builds easier to use at most levels). Could get a lot more into that, but I'm still doing my own testing with bears and want to confirm some things first.

    I agree with your statements about rhinos feeling awkward. They're suppose to be a dual type that can be used as both support mage and frontline, but since they lack both range and sturdiness, cannot do either effectively. Like bears, it seems like all of their power is focused into one or two abilities, and should be redistributed, probably. I don't play them that often, and rarely see them where I play as well, so I won't say more about it.

    Foxes are similar to rhino in the sense that they seem a little awkward still, but fox is a lot better off than rhino in that sense. They work as one would assume an assassin class should work. I think reducing their damage is dangerous. Probably would put them where they were - easy kills with no chance of winning. Right now, they're probably one of the hardest classes to use, but I've seen some satisfying results from them a number of times (I personally am very bad at foxes :P).

    Ah, birds. No, they don't need a dodge buff. And no, they don't need more damage. They're the class that gets better and better as you go up in level. We shouldn't make them stronger for lower levels when they actually are quite strong right now in higher levels, as this would result in them being even stronger later. People choosing not to bring evade at 35 is asking to be 1-shot by voodoos. I feel no sympathy. :P However, I personally think that making a class rely fully on RNG for both their damage and defense (only +crit and +dodge for birds) can be frustrating for the users of these classes. I've always been of the mind that I'd rather evade be changed to something that adds +armor and +dodge, in order to make it more reliable, and a similar change for focus.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zapoke For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    The Ministry
    Posts
    2,052
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    561
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    702
    Thanked in
    385 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zapoke View Post
    My experience is mostly from 35, 50 and 56.

    Foxes and birds dying in two hits to a class thats focus is burst damage is not strange at all. Those two are both suppose to be that way: high damage, low defense. At any rate, the mage buff is somewhat in line with the buff that's most similar to it - bear's rage. In fact, it's now much weaker than rage. Don't personally think mages need to be tuned much. The other classes are what need to be worked on more.

    However, there does seem to be something fundamentally wrong with how bear's sturdiness (or lack there of, really) is working right now. Evade feels useless, iron blood by itself isn't good enough to make them tanky, and thus the tank class for PL has been reduced to a 1 shot or be 1 shot class, which just.. seems wrong to me, personally. I think what they need is to have their strengths changed from focusing on their rage-beckon-stomp, to keeping people locked in place and debuffed. Their evade should probably be changed completely into something else. Maybe change it to add hit and armor or something (could make pure strength builds easier to use at most levels). Could get a lot more into that, but I'm still doing my own testing with bears and want to confirm some things first.

    I agree with your statements about rhinos feeling awkward. They're suppose to be a dual type that can be used as both support mage and frontline, but since they lack both range and sturdiness, cannot do either effectively. Like bears, it seems like all of their power is focused into one or two abilities, and should be redistributed, probably. I don't play them that often, and rarely see them where I play as well, so I won't say more about it.

    Foxes are similar to rhino in the sense that they seem a little awkward still, but fox is a lot better off than rhino in that sense. They work as one would assume an assassin class should work. I think reducing their damage is dangerous. Probably would put them where they were - easy kills with no chance of winning. Right now, they're probably one of the hardest classes to use, but I've seen some satisfying results from them a number of times (I personally am very bad at foxes :P).

    Ah, birds. No, they don't need a dodge buff. And no, they don't need more damage. They're the class that gets better and better as you go up in level. We shouldn't make them stronger for lower levels when they actually are quite strong right now in higher levels, as this would result in them being even stronger later. People choosing not to bring evade at 35 is asking to be 1-shot by voodoos. I feel no sympathy. :P However, I personally think that making a class rely fully on RNG for both their damage and defense (only +crit and +dodge for birds) can be frustrating for the users of these classes. I've always been of the mind that I'd rather evade be changed to something that adds +armor and +dodge, in order to make it more reliable, and a similar change for focus.
    Sorry for long quote first off.

    You're probably right about the mage part, and bears definitely need a sturdiness buff. Also fox was doing ok for me for a short while, until people realized they could just early ms and nuke me. Also shredder stacks, but a fox will never live long enough to get that 128 armor debuff. Also never living enough to do triple combo is annoying. I think birds should get something at this level. But you bring up a good point about later balance. And a new weapon would be usable for all classes so idk about that.

    Thank you for the reply! Was nice to get some feedback.

    Quote Originally Posted by Coolaid90 View Post
    So your saying my response is bad?
    It just seemed like a complaint, and didn't actually analyze anything.
    Ign - Coolguymage

Similar Threads

  1. Need opinions
    By Reunegade in forum PL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-30-2013, 11:05 AM
  2. Opinions on PvP?
    By Arcanee in forum AL Player vs. Player
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-14-2013, 06:04 PM
  3. Quick Question; Quick Answer/Current PL FAQs
    By Whirlzap in forum PL General Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-02-2011, 09:40 PM
  4. Toon specific quick chats and/or quick chat loadouts etc.
    By drewcapu in forum PL Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-06-2011, 11:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •