Why nerf this?

[Cinco]

Can we do a 20% haste? Its probably the max limit to do on a pet I guess. Or change its hb to something useful for war like (16% haste, 23% damage stacking, 18% damage reduction stacking, + 40 dex int str, + 55 primary stat.)

We'll be doing a +15% sustained Haste with this pet.

[kulldeepboro]

We'll be doing a +15% sustained Haste with this pet.

meh

sent with love

[Encryptions]

We'll be doing a +15% sustained Haste with this pet.

Ok ok, 15% haste with the other stats sir sir?
Rogue gets arc lovling as a maxed out pet with absolutely everything a rogue needs. Crit, damage stack, damage reduct stack, and mana ignore.
Mage gets many pet variations based on its type of game play.
Warrior gets 0 actually warrior type pets. By warrior type I mean: Dmg stacking, Dmg redu stacking, haste, and crit chance.

[Ploid]

Ok ok, 15% haste with the other stats sir sir?
Rogue gets arc lovling as a maxed out pet with absolutely everything a rogue needs. Crit, damage stack, damage reduct stack, and mana ignore.
Mage gets many pet variations based on its type of game play.
Warrior gets 0 actually warrior type pets. By warrior type I mean: Dmg stacking, Dmg redu stacking, haste, and crit chance.

Not rlly, Mages have Arc Senti for Haste or Yinshe for BD, not many run Arc Loveling for damage reduction from what I know.

Warriors have the same choices as everyone else.



Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[Encryptions]

Not rlly, Mages have Arc Senti for Haste or Yinshe for BD, not many run Arc Loveling for damage reduction from what I know.

Warriors have the same choices as everyone else.



Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

You didn't read what I said. Rogue -> arc love.
Mage many pets optional.
Warrior 2 haste pets. Haste is what makes war actually useful.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

[Ploid]

You didn't read what I said. Rogue -> arc love.
Mage many pets optional.
Warrior 2 haste pets. Haste is what makes war actually useful.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk

If a pet is already providing u with haste, why do u insist another pet does the same? U can already use the one u have.

Most people slot in the haste pet for their hb, so it's not like u don't like the way the pet looks.

Also, u can't be asking the best of every world in one single pet, at the end of the day, it's our decision to make what exactly we need for our playstyle!

If u wanna have haste = arc senti, if u wanna be more tanky = arc bemine/arc loveling... If u wanna have the maximum raw damage = arc Samson.

Having eveything in one pet would make every other pet that exists very boring and dull. As far as I remember, weren't u the one saying that pets should be unique?

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[Switchback]

If a pet is already providing u with haste, why do u insist another pet does the same? U can already use the one u have.

Most people slot in the haste pet for their hb, so it's not like u don't like the way the pet looks.

Also, u can't be asking the best of every world in one single pet, at the end of the day, it's our decision to make what exactly we need for our playstyle!

If u wanna have haste = arc senti, if u wanna be more tanky = arc bemine/arc loveling... If u wanna have the maximum raw damage = arc Samson.

Having eveything in one pet would make every other pet that exists very boring and dull. As far as I remember, weren't u the one saying that pets should be unique?

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

Let him live in dreamland. Thinking the gamebreaking pet hb that was suggested is even feasible goes to show you some people dont know what they are talking about.

[Nexior]

We'll be doing a +15% sustained Haste with this pet.

So if we stay with 15% add 30% non stacking dmg..

Wysłane z mojego ASUS_I005DA przy użyciu Tapatalka

[Crocodile]

We'll be doing a +15% sustained Haste with this pet.

Lame

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk