Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: say no to combo jewel

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,276
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    650
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    582
    Thanked in
    328 Posts

    Default say no to combo jewel

    recently i've seen quite some repetition on ideas of having a combination jewel, but after some thoughts, i think except if it is intended to make jewels (which is not a mandatory component of a gear) to become a lot more significant than the gear itself, i'd like to say no to the idea itself

    some reasons are:

    1. noble jewel has a l30 requirement, imagine if there is going to be a jewel with l40 requirement with +10 primary, it will be around 50% more powerful than a grand, and almost equal to an eye

    2. imagine if there is going to be a combination jewel, for two or more jewels of this l40 requirement say with a total of +20 attribute, while the gear itself only have like 70 total attribute, a gear will have 70 total attribute + 2/3 jewels with +20 attribute each, it's like saying almost 50% of a gear is jewel...

    3. what will be the point of having limited socket slot, if we can always get the best of the two worlds, and even if they make combination slightly less powerful than an addition of two or more jewels, it will only provide unnecessary complexity, it's better to release more interesting jewels like proc jewels, or dodge jewel, etc etc

    of course this cases are the most extreme possibility, but it won't hurt to sometime think for the extreme case (worst/best), sts wouldn't want to make another same mistake because sts failed to calculate the most extreme case (e.g. last year eyes' critical bonus, this event's medium cakes), and it's better to do some good testing before releasing significant things. but again, if it is intended by sts to make jewels become significant and mandatory, then so be it, and sts should stick to it, and increase its availability permanently, not temporally by some events

    thank you

    P.S. buff stampy pls...
    Last edited by extrapayah; 11-18-2015 at 06:37 PM.
    always milking, no service
    AL IGN: Extrapayah/Extraparah/Extrajelek
    Support Shared Pet Stable Please!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to extrapayah For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Forum Adept Lastmind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    37
    Thanked in
    25 Posts

    Default

    I think the current system is great, no need to combine jewels.
    Some secondary stat jewels should just be slightly buffed
    IGN: Obakemono

  4. #3
    Senior Member eugene9707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    32
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    277
    Thanked in
    146 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by extrapayah View Post
    recently i've seen quite some repetition on ideas of having a combination jewel, but after some thoughts, i think except if it is intended to make jewels (which is not a mandatory component of a gear) to become a lot more significant than the gear itself, i'd like to say no to the idea itself

    some reasons are:

    1. noble jewel has a l30 requirement, imagine if there is going to be a jewel with l40 requirement with +10 primary, it will be around 50% more powerful than a grand, and almost equal to an eye

    2. imagine if there is going to be a combination jewel, for two or more jewels of this l40 requirement say with a total of +20 attribute, while the gear itself only have like 70 total attribute, a gear will have 70 total attribute + 2/3 jewels with +20 attribute each, it's like saying almost 50% of a gear is jewel...

    3. what will be the point of having limited socket slot, if we can always get the best of the two worlds, and even if they make combination slightly less powerful than an addition of two or more jewels, it will only provide unnecessary complexity, it's better to release more interesting jewels like proc jewels, or dodge jewel, etc etc

    of course this cases are the most extreme possibility, but it won't hurt to sometime think for the extreme case (worst/best), sts wouldn't want to make another same mistake because sts failed to calculate the most extreme case (e.g. last year eyes' critical bonus, this event's medium cakes), and it's better to do some good testing before releasing significant things. but again, if it is intended by sts to make jewels become significant and mandatory, then so be it, and sts should stick to it, and increase its availability permanently, not temporally by some events

    thank you

    P.S. buff stampy pls...
    1. By the way the system is going now, you will need 19683 cracked jewel to craft it .... so good luck with that

    2 i think when you combine jewels you should get less of each (like the the game gemcraft)
    3. again, point 2

    But i agree, it'll be a pain to figure the best system to combine jewels


  5. #4
    Forum Adept Beatmap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    328
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    7
    Thanked in
    4 Posts

    Default

    the current system is good. no changes required
    --Beatmap--

  6. #5
    Senior Member Titanium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Bucharest
    Posts
    2,740
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    577
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,074
    Thanked in
    474 Posts

    Default

    At least we should have a recipe as a platinum tier reward to craft a 3-in-1 jewel ( standard + weak + damaged ). For our sake, we can't sit and do nothing on every event that is released from now on only because last year gave us something that was reacheable by the previous gem-system in a way or another.

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,177
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    117
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,249
    Thanked in
    446 Posts

    Default

    I want combination jewels to make use of the crappy jewels ( nature, water, lightning, diamond). Other jewels can stay the same.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Ravager For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Forum Adept
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    464
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    32
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    86
    Thanked in
    55 Posts

    Default

    Anyone fort of allowing players to remove a jewl or gem in a piece of gear and losing the gear but keeping 1 jewl from the gear it would 1 sort out the mass amount of some gears and it would also make it easer with jewls/gems

  10. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    990
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    172
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    216
    Thanked in
    133 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Itemstore View Post
    Anyone fort of allowing players to remove a jewl or gem in a piece of gear and losing the gear but keeping 1 jewl from the gear it would 1 sort out the mass amount of some gears and it would also make it easer with jewls/gems
    They are trying to get rid of the paras, not keep them around.

  11. #9
    Blogger kinzmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Are you a stalker? Awesomeness: ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
    Posts
    1,620
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    145
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    426
    Thanked in
    248 Posts

    Default Yes to Combined Jewel

    Quote Originally Posted by extrapayah View Post
    1. noble jewel has a l30 requirement, imagine if there is going to be a jewel with l40 requirement with +10 primary, it will be around 50% more powerful than a grand, and almost equal to an eye
    Your overthinking it, jewels are meant to overpower gems so that the gems would be obsolete and phased out as the game progress.

    Quote Originally Posted by extrapayah View Post
    2. imagine if there is going to be a combination jewel, for two or more jewels of this l40 requirement say with a total of +20 attribute, while the gear itself only have like 70 total attribute, a gear will have 70 total attribute + 2/3 jewels with +20 attribute each, it's like saying almost 50% of a gear is jewel...
    By the time jewels reaches level 40 requirements the new gears would have gained better and significant stat improvements too. The game is meant to move forward, else it will get boring being stucked.

    Quote Originally Posted by extrapayah View Post
    3. what will be the point of having limited socket slot, if we can always get the best of the two worlds, and even if they make combination slightly less powerful than an addition of two or more jewels, it will only provide unnecessary complexity, it's better to release more interesting jewels like proc jewels, or dodge jewel, etc etc
    Having limited slot limits the maximum possible jewels you can add to your gears, what else is it for? But I get your point in having limited slot but each slot gets combo of any desired stat in a combo jewel. Theres no concrete rule on how the combo jewels would be, what would be the possible scenarios? What are the possible effect? What would be the best combinations possible? Etc etc.. All of these are mere speculation, we can discuss this again when the devs would really make a combined jewel and layout how its done. By that time we will have a solid basis on our argument .


    YES! To combined jewel
    YES! To game progress

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kinzmet For This Useful Post:


  13. #10
    Senior Member Earlingstad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Arcane Forever
    Posts
    745
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    242
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    119
    Thanked in
    79 Posts

    Default

    YES to combined stat jewels.

    For instance, a revamped Eye of Syrillax and its return as a jewel with slightly better stats than old eye. Ideally, its recipe (consumed after use) to be looted from Syrillax and ingredients would be current cracked jewels.
    Last edited by Earlingstad; 11-20-2015 at 12:39 AM.

  14. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,276
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    650
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    582
    Thanked in
    328 Posts

    Default

    hmmmm, first thank you for the replies

    let's say we will have a trinity jewel, a damaged version of it will need 2 cracked fury, 2 cracked finesse, 2 cracked mind, and the damaged version will have all +1 attribute, question is, how many attributes the weak version is given? all +2 will be too big, but if it is still +1, it will be strange... problem with jewel is it has its own tier, level, so something like not increasing its bonus in next tier is unacceptable

    some jewel already overpowered some grand gems in its respective level, if it needs new cap to release next tier of jewel, it is just illogical, what will be the reason of it? releasing l40 jewel only after l51 gears released? why it needs 2 expansion to maximize potential power of l40 gears?

    some jewels have been really unattractive, yes... i think it is a mistake to make some jewel looks weaker than the other, and admittedly by sts, by making these jewels only droppable at old maps... all these jewels are used in the same slots, so it is important to make all jewel equally attractive, sts should be brave to buff these unattractive jewels, and should not worry to make it too op, if sts oberbuffed it, sts can always nerf it back... finding a value that players will want to exchange with is not easy, so continuos buff and nerf is acceptable at some degree
    and jewels should be equal, so does its farming method

    as for first para and first eyes bonus, it was a mistake that could make slottable things become way too significant... it needs to be stopped from scaling and probably stopped from getting usable. it will never phased out thanks to twink items, releasing a more powerful gears for twink to attract people leaving old gemmed gears could be disaster, except if sts make those gear available anytime

    but yes, if there is going to be a combined jewel, it should never combine between good jewels... currently sts implicitly make each jewela have different quality by its farming maps, water and nature available for all maps, except rengol, diamonds start from kraken maps, lightning starts from shuyal, primary start from tindirin, arena, and chaos start from rengol, planar tombs, which i never agree with...

    thank you
    always milking, no service
    AL IGN: Extrapayah/Extraparah/Extrajelek
    Support Shared Pet Stable Please!

  15. #12
    Senior Member Ebezaanec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chivalrous Union
    Posts
    2,625
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    370
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,128
    Thanked in
    568 Posts

    Default

    Winter Event might have a special "Syrillax Jewel" that grants a special particle effect (please no blinding ones). After the event, generic combo jewels will probably be released.

    The particle effect would be exclusive to the "Syrillax Jewel."
    Ebezaanec|Ebezairec|Ebezcookie|Trisomy|Apothem

    Following the Code

Similar Threads

  1. Need advice on a Jewel combo (:
    By Disproves in forum AL General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-10-2015, 01:15 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •