Admitting the mistake is nice. Correcting it would be even nicer.
Admitting the mistake is nice. Correcting it would be even nicer.
Nobody forced STS to decide in his favor, the final fault lies with them. No, he shouldn't have asked for or expected special treatment but that is what players do. STS should have known better and part of the cost of their mistake is that many of its customers are dissatisfied and some will spend less on the game because of it.
Member Arlorian Realtors Association
Last edited by Zeus; 04-08-2015 at 04:11 PM.
Click My Signature to Check Out My YouTube Channel.
Warning: Any Beggars Will Be Put On Ignore List
He bought the pet with gold.
Free means no cost. He could not have transferred SnS if he did not buy or win it in the first place so it cannot be free. SNS can no longer be purchased either so this analogy does not work.
I agree with you on many things but asking a player to pay for a mistake that was not his isn't right either.
Click My Signature to Check Out My YouTube Channel.
Warning: Any Beggars Will Be Put On Ignore List
IKR. Move on guys. The entire issue has played out 10x. It was a mistake, one that they aren't going to make on anyone else. No need to punish the guy who got his transferred, I am sure wasn't his intent whatsoever for this to happen. We need to focus and redirect on more important stuff!!!!
There were never going to be any changes from the beginning of this thread. It was just a means of containing the increasing number of threads asking about item/pet transfer. Letting the community vent off and ban whoever took it too far. Not quite the constructive conversation topic it was labeled to be.
Plat player movws on but harmful in free player eye see plat player get special atention
Click My Signature to Check Out My YouTube Channel.
Warning: Any Beggars Will Be Put On Ignore List
If SNS was also removed from the warrior account (it was, I believe) the free large gift argument loses its leverage. It's an unfair transfer of existing wealth, not a massive gift of new wealth.
It's not fair to the community for the mistake to stand, but it would also be equally unfair to the individual player to move it back without his consent. STS would do further harm to the integrity of the game if they also caved to the whole community. No doubt there will be no more pet transfers from this point on, so the rules are now even more clear to the community.
I think we're spending more time on this than we need, as the damage was already done and it would be a terrible precedent if STS altered an account that hadn't violated the TOS against the player's wishes. That would also open STS to a lawsuit, believe me nobody wants to get the lawyers involved!
Member Arlorian Realtors Association
Okay, so STS did a pet transfer one time. Maybe they did it by mistake?
Mistake or not, it doesn't matter anymore. This was one week ago? two weeks? I don't know.
In my opinion, this is just a minor bump in the road (did I use this phrase right? If i didn't sorry).
Lets leave it in the past and move on to things of more importance. (i.e. the new AL Expansion and CoC's development)
Hello Folks,
This thread has indeed run its course. Many thanks to all of you who stuck to constructive feedback.
Much Obliged,
Adrian "Productor" Glover
Bookmarks