Thread of randomness

**Barrington** · 11-04-2011, 04:07 AM

ok so its a random thread anything you like i.e
off topic pictures
funny videos/pics
music videos
absolutely anything
etc.

ill start off
heres a picture of an awesome named energy drink
Name: 2011-11-02 18.28.17.jpg
Views: 483
Size: 210.6 KB

Name: 2011-11-02 18.28.17.jpg
Views: 483
Size: 210.6 KB

if you love this thread show some love in the form of thanks/thumbs up

**kingatdeath** · 11-04-2011, 04:43 AM

Peeps are funny...

**Trollee** · 11-04-2011, 06:29 AM

TRIPPY!

**MimeRifle** · 11-04-2011, 07:32 AM

Originally Posted by Honeypot

Attachment 2292

LOL!!! Kitten Says: "IF ITZ NOT FOR SLEEPZ, WHYZIT MADE OF WARM?!?!?"

**Handsofmyvodka** · 11-04-2011, 03:20 PM

Here ya go

Dum bunny stole my line

:'(

AHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

MWAHHhahahaha

OWEWWW!!! you jerk!

Ummmm

When will the world end?

**Barrington** · 11-05-2011, 10:40 AM

hey does anyone have steam Add LordBarrington

**MimeRifle** · 11-29-2011, 07:59 AM

How's this for random? Did you ever notice how often someone says "Beg the question"?? "Gee, Jim... that's a good point, but it does beg the question of..." Well, that isn't what the phrase really means. It's actually a logical fallacy. Come, look closer!

Unlike most informal fallacies, Begging the Question is a validating form of argument. Moreover, if the premisses of an instance of Begging the Question happen to be true, then the argument is sound. What is wrong, then, with Begging the Question?

First of all, not all circular reasoning is fallacious. Suppose, for instance, that we argue that a number of propositions, p1, p2,…, pn are equivalent by arguing as follows (where "p => q" means that p implies q):

p1 => p2 => … => pn => p1

Then we have clearly argued in a circle, but this is a standard form of argument in mathematics to show that a set of propositions are all equivalent to each other. So, when is it fallacious to argue in a circle?

For an argument to have any epistemological or dialectical force, it must start from premisses already known or believed by its audience, and proceed to a conclusion not known or believed. This, of course, rules out the worst cases of Begging the Question, when the conclusion is the very same proposition as the premiss, since one cannot both believe and not believe the same thing. A viciously circular argument is one with a conclusion based ultimately upon that conclusion itself, and such arguments can never advance our knowledge.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it my esteemed Legendeers!!