A little earlier today I was bored and started to think randomly about random things, so I came across the topic of majority wins. I don't think majority should ALWAYS win.
For example, let's say I say something in a quote and everyone wants to put it in their sig quoting me, but it actually wasn't me, it was another person with a similar username as me (it's only an example its not true lol), and later on that person deletes that post.
So those people that sigged the other me tell ME that "Oh I can't believe you said this!" etc etc etc, but I start to tell them it wasn't me. So the argument continues eventually until someone decides to investigate to see if I said that quote or not.
They find out it wasn't me and it was the other me, but everyone who sigged the other me continues to assume that it was me who said that quote. Would it be possible for the majority to STILL win if this was brought as a court case in California?
Answers appreciated^^!
Bookmarks